Do prior motion serial verbs (go) morphologize? Insights into diachrony from typology

  • Daniel Ross University of California, Riverside, United States https://orcid.org/
  • Joseph Lovestrand School of Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, SOAS University of London, United Kingdom
Keywords: Serial verb constructions, associated motion, grammaticalization, typology

Abstract

Associated motion is a grammatical category which modifies a verbal predicate by adding a motion component such as indicating that motion took place prior to the event predicated by the verb. Many languages express prior associated motion (‘go and V’) in the form of a serial verb construction, while in other languages the same meaning is expressed morphologically. This suggests a possible diachronic link between serial verbs and affixes, but a comparison of the synchronic distributions of prior associated motion in serial verb constructions and verbal morphology reveal that such a path of grammaticalization is remarkably rare. This can be at least partially explained by temporal iconicity and a cross-linguistic suffixing bias. We conclude that prior motion serial verb constructions are relatively stable diachronically. The source of prior motion morphology is more likely other multiverb constructions, especially those with non-finite verbs where an overt morpheme marking dependency is lost to allow for a more efficient expression of this grammatical category, ultimately leading to univerbation.
Published
2022-12-31
How to Cite
Ross, D., & Lovestrand, J. (2022). Do prior motion serial verbs (go) morphologize? Insights into diachrony from typology. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 65(1), 105-145. https://doi.org/10.5842/65-1-972
Section
Part 3: Dynamization of synchrony – A typological perspective

Most read articles by the same author(s)