Begging to be goed: Voicing discrimination in multilingual and multiethnic Netherlands
Abstract
This paper explores political discourse on two public issues involving discrimination in the Netherlands, centered on the terms Kutmarokkanen and Zwarte Piet. The paper discusses the Bakhtinian poluphony of different ‘voices’ in the public debates surrounding these issues: the voices of those protesting because they experience discrimination, the voices of those defending or justifying it, the voices in the press or in academic discourse describing it, the voices of the government and of the politicians. What are the terms used, and the underlying concepts or attitudes? The argument presented in analyzing these voices centers around the idea that the sharp moral distinction between goed/fout ‘good’/’wrong’ in Dutch public consciousness makes it difficult for the Dutch people to look at themselves objectively, and critically examine their own concepts of society and of their fellow citizens with a different background.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2016-12-12
How to Cite
Muysken, P. (2016). Begging to be goed: Voicing discrimination in multilingual and multiethnic Netherlands. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus, 49, 343-358. https://doi.org/10.5842/49-0-702
Section
IV. Research notes
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).